<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jon minus Kate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popmommy.com/reality-tv/jon-minus-kate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popmommy.com/reality-tv/jon-minus-kate</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:35:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PopMommy Pam</title>
		<link>http://www.popmommy.com/reality-tv/jon-minus-kate/comment-page-1#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>PopMommy Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popmommy.com/?p=399#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Mike - I really appreciate your point about &quot;kids&quot; being first.  I remember watching an OPRAH episode where she was talking to families.  Most of the couples always said the KIDS came first and their SPOUSE was second.  They were shocked when the guest said that YOU should come first, your SPOUSE should come second, and your KIDS third.  Most parents would be shocked to put their kids last.  But I agree, your marriage came first and a healthy, happy marriage will ultimately lead to a healthy, happy family.  Thanks for your post.  I will def. check out that book as well. Pam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; I really appreciate your point about &#8220;kids&#8221; being first.  I remember watching an OPRAH episode where she was talking to families.  Most of the couples always said the KIDS came first and their SPOUSE was second.  They were shocked when the guest said that YOU should come first, your SPOUSE should come second, and your KIDS third.  Most parents would be shocked to put their kids last.  But I agree, your marriage came first and a healthy, happy marriage will ultimately lead to a healthy, happy family.  Thanks for your post.  I will def. check out that book as well. Pam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Outler</title>
		<link>http://www.popmommy.com/reality-tv/jon-minus-kate/comment-page-1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Outler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popmommy.com/?p=399#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Interesting and great commentary.  My wife and I thought last night, as the show was airing, why do we keep hearing &quot;kids&quot; this and &quot;kids&quot; that.  Maybe, just maybe, if they would have put as much effort in their marriage as they do their kids, things might have not gone south so quickly.  A book by a prominent pastor friend of mine, Ed Young, titled, &quot;Kid CEO&quot; talks about letting the &quot;kids&quot; take over the house and rule the parents lives.  No doubt, they have tremendous challenges with eight little ones, but there has to be a balance within raising children and we have to remember that the marriage came before the kids.
One other thought, do you think that when Jon &amp; Kate mentioned the fact that the house belonged to the children, it made me wonder whether or not that house was built for the eight little ones and not mom and dad so they may be left with no choice.  Breach of contract?  Hmmm;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and great commentary.  My wife and I thought last night, as the show was airing, why do we keep hearing &#8220;kids&#8221; this and &#8220;kids&#8221; that.  Maybe, just maybe, if they would have put as much effort in their marriage as they do their kids, things might have not gone south so quickly.  A book by a prominent pastor friend of mine, Ed Young, titled, &#8220;Kid CEO&#8221; talks about letting the &#8220;kids&#8221; take over the house and rule the parents lives.  No doubt, they have tremendous challenges with eight little ones, but there has to be a balance within raising children and we have to remember that the marriage came before the kids.<br />
One other thought, do you think that when Jon &amp; Kate mentioned the fact that the house belonged to the children, it made me wonder whether or not that house was built for the eight little ones and not mom and dad so they may be left with no choice.  Breach of contract?  Hmmm;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://www.popmommy.com/reality-tv/jon-minus-kate/comment-page-1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popmommy.com/?p=399#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Pretty cool post. I just came by your blog and wanted to say 
that I&#039;ve really liked reading your posts. Anyway 
I&#039;ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty cool post. I just came by your blog and wanted to say<br />
that I&#8217;ve really liked reading your posts. Anyway<br />
I&#8217;ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.popmommy.com/reality-tv/jon-minus-kate/comment-page-1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popmommy.com/?p=399#comment-45</guid>
		<description>My theory, for what it&#039;s worth, is that this whole divorce thing was contrived for ratings, and that they&#039;ll miraculously save their marriage over the course of the season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My theory, for what it&#8217;s worth, is that this whole divorce thing was contrived for ratings, and that they&#8217;ll miraculously save their marriage over the course of the season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

